Not to get too political on this blog, but this debate over Amendment 26 (the "Personhood Amendment") really makes my blood pressure rise. I feel like a lot of people are not seeing the bigger picture here and are not educating themselves AT ALL on what all is included in this amendment.
It is not a pro-abortion or anti-abortion vote at all. It's about at what point an embryo is considered an actual person and all that is associated with the treatment of said "person" shortly after conception.
There are a lot of unanswered questions about how this amendment would affect fertility treatments, and I, for one, think that fertility treatments and abortion should not in any way be grouped together for any purpose. Any blanket amendment that would target both should be seriously reviewed because they're on total opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of intent.
I walk the line in terms of my values, but overall I tend to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal. I feel like Mississippi, as a whole, can be so backwards sometimes.
I heard someone the news last night say that "the nation is focusing on Mississippi, and that this is our chance to be first in life rather than last in everything." Let me set the record straight with some statistics...
Mississippi is No. 1 in the country for teen births with a teen birth rate of 65.7, meaning out of 1,000 teenagers, 65 of them will have a baby. But you know what else? We're the second to last state (above Wyoming) for abortion rate with a rate of 4.6, meaning out of 1,000 women ages 15-44, there are fewer than five terminations. Those numbers have not a single thing to do with one another. Passing this amendment to make abortion illegal in Mississippi will have no effect on bringing down the teen pregnancy rate in Mississippi. Some might argue that it will do just the opposite.
Mississippi has only one abortion clinic in the state, and legislation is presented every year to try and shut it down. I'm NOT saying I'm pro-abortion at all. That's a topic that's obviously very difficult and sensitive to discuss, and this blog is not about that. I just feel like there's a never-ending circle of ignorance that people don't feel the need to address. Why not switch our focus to educating our teenagers about sex and STDs and the consequences of teen pregnancy, etc., rather than just ignore the reality that they're having sex? By pretending like it doesn't happen we end up with more teen moms who don't finish school, who can't get a decent job because they don't finish school, who are dependant on federal assistance because they can't afford to live, etc. It just never ends, but that's a totally different topic right there. Back to the debate at hand...
To the majority of people who will vote on this, this amendment is either pro- or anti-abortion, and there's just so much more to it than that.
They have not take into consideration the thousands of couples who want desperately to have a child and have to resort to science and clinical assistance to help make that dream a reality. And trust me, if this amendment passes without separate consideration for fertility treatments, there will be enough red tape associated with what is legal/illegal for doctors to do that it will be hard for them to continue fertility practices as-is in this state. It would most definitely limit physicians' treatment protocol options for those seeking fertility assistance, and I feel sure that any couple faced with that issue would want every single available option at their disposal.
There are plenty of opinions out there on both sides, and I'm not saying one is right and one is wrong. I just feel like this is a "blanket" amendment that hides some of the unintended consequences of its passage. Just be educated if you plan on voting, and consider all sides, even if it doesn't seem like it may directly affect you. That's all.
Okay, off my soapbox... Thanks for letting to me vent. :)